Thursday, December 27, 2012

Blog has moved again

The blog has moved to Wordpress.

Please visit the NEW blog, Lion of the Blogosphere.

Les Miserables

Somehow, I managed to get this far in life without ever having seen the Broadway musical. Nevertheless, I am pretty certain that the movie is objectively superior in every way to the live musical. You can see all of the characters close up, the sets are gorgeous, and every scene is going to have a higher level of perfection because they can be shot multiple times until they are just right, and then they are edited afterward. Live theater is a positional good which is desirable because it’s expensive. Thorstein Veblen would no doubt call it “conspicuous consumption,” and the consumers of such can demonstrate their superior bourgeois tastes over the uncultured proletarian masses who watch movies like Paul Blart: Mall Cop.

I’ve also managed to get this far in life knowing very little about the period of French history in which Les Miserables takes place. I blame the mediocre public school system for this gap in my education. (I highly recommend sending your kids to private school if you can afford it.)

The movie itself is long. Are you ready for more than two and a half hours of singing? Unlike what I consider the quintessential musical movie, Grease, which features a lighthearted story alternating between normal spoken parts and the characters doing lip-synched musical performances, Les Miserable is more like a modern high tech English-language opera. There are hardly any spoken parts, nearly everything is sung, and as other reviews have pointed out, the characters are truly singing their parts and not lip-synching them. There is also not much about this movie that’s lighthearted at all, except for the song “Master of the House” performed by Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter who play the greedy scheming innkeepers whose extortion of money from Fantine for taking care of her illegitimate daughter Cosette leads to her demise in prostitution.

I had originally thought that I wouldn’t want to listen to any of this music again, but I’ve been listening to the soundtrack all day, and I’m actually quite enjoying it.

The most significant aspect of this movie is the strong Christian theme. It’s very rare, these days, to see a movie that’s unironically Christian. Now I can see readers having two extreme points of view on this, from “darn, I thought Hollywood has finally stamped out Christianity, and now this” to “yay! about time!”


What makes this movie Christian? The main character, Jean Valjean, is Jesus-like in his 19 years of suffering through harsh slavery. But he is able to obtain redemption because of the faith of Bishop Myriel who saves him from arrest and return to slavery and allows him to keep the silver items he stole from the church to fund his future life, which he lives in an exemplary Christian fashion. After that, Valjean has many opportunities to do the expedient but morally wrong thing, but he always does what’s right, and the movie clearly lets you know that he will be rewarded in the afterlife for his good behavior.


This movie has my recommendation, and if it wins any Academy Awards, they are deserved.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

NY Times can't get the story straight on college

In today’s NY Times, we see an article which worries that people in Montana are forsaking college to work at $50,000/year jobs in the oil fields.

It is a lucrative but risky decision for any 18-year-old to make, one that could foreclose on his future if the frenzied pace of oil and gas drilling from here to North Dakota to Texas falters and work dries up.

The guy who wrote this (Jack Healy) obviously didn’t attempt to synchronize his message with the NY Times article from this weekend about how three girls from lower socioeconomic backgrounds went to college but it didn’t work out so well for them. All they got out of college was a lot of debt.

Now, in theory, yes, it’s a lot better to have a good white-collar career track than to do manual labor in the oil fields. The oil companies will just fire these people when there’s no more oil or they can find cheaper labor (such as immigrants or robots).

But how many of these kids from Montana allegedly forsaking college to work in the oil fields have a realistic chance of getting into a good white-collar career track? Most would probably end up like the girl in the NY Times article who has $61,000 of student loan debt and is working at a furniture store for $8.50 an hour. This is especially true if they are only marginally college material or if their parents are working-class and unable to give them proper career and life guidance.